FP Markets vs Quadcode Markets
A side-by-side look at FP Markets and Quadcode Marketsusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
FP Markets
Score 8.88Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
Quadcode Markets
Score 8.28ASIC-regulated trading with spreads from 0.9 pips
FP Markets vs Quadcode Markets: the short verdict
FP Markets carries the higher overall score of the two — 8.88 against Quadcode Markets's 8.28. FP Markets lists more regulators than Quadcode Markets (4 to 2), including ASIC, CMA and CySEC. Both run on Proprietary platform. FP Markets additionally lists MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. FP Markets is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2005 against 2022 for Quadcode Markets.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | FP Markets | Quadcode Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $100 | $50 ,20€ |
| Raw Spread | 0.0 pips | Undisclosed |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | ASIC, CMA, CySEC, +1 others | ASIC, CySEC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 others | Proprietary platform |
| Islamic Acc | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Overall rating | 8.88 | 8.28 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving FP Markets and Quadcode Markets.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.