Head-to-head broker comparison

FP Markets vs XM Group

A side-by-side look at FP Markets and XM Groupusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.

FP Markets logo

FP Markets

Score 8.88

Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure

XM Group logo

XM Group

Score 9.15

Multi-jurisdiction regulated broker trusted across global markets

FP Markets vs XM Group: the short verdict

XM Group carries the higher overall score of the two — 9.15 against FP Markets's 8.88. FP Markets lists more regulators than XM Group (4 to 3), including ASIC, CMA and CySEC. XM Group has the lower minimum deposit at 5 USD, against $100 at FP Markets. Both run on MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and Proprietary platform. FP Markets additionally lists cTrader and Web-based. FP Markets is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2005 against 2009 for XM Group.

Side-by-side comparison

FP Markets compared with XM Group
FeatureFP MarketsXM Group
Min Deposit$1005 USD
Raw Spread0.0 pipsFrom 0.8 pips
Max LeverageVaries by jurisdiction and account type1000:1
RegulationsASIC, CMA, CySEC, +1 othersFSA, FSC, IFSC
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 othersMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 others
Islamic AccNoYes
Copy TradingNoYes
Overall rating8.889.15

This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads involving FP Markets and XM Group.

Still deciding?

Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.

Compare all brokers