FXCM vs STARTRADER
A side-by-side look at FXCM and STARTRADERusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
STARTRADER
Score 9.19Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
FXCM vs STARTRADER: the short verdict
FXCM carries the higher overall score of the two — 9.4 against STARTRADER's 9.19. STARTRADER lists more regulators than FXCM (5 to 4), including ASIC, FSA and FSC Mauritius. Both open accounts from the same $50 minimum deposit. STARTRADER quotes the tighter raw spread — 0.0 pips, against 0.2 pips at FXCM. Both run on MetaTrader 4. FXCM additionally lists Proprietary platform and Web-based; STARTRADER lists MetaTrader 5. FXCM is the longer-established of the two, trading since 1999 against 2013 for STARTRADER.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | FXCM | STARTRADER |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $50 | 50$ |
| Raw Spread | 0.2 pips | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | ASIC, CySEC, FCA, +1 others | ASIC, FSA, FSC Mauritius, +2 others |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform, +1 others | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 |
| Islamic Acc | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Overall rating | 9.4 | 9.19 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving FXCM and STARTRADER.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.