Head-to-head broker comparison

Quadcode Markets vs ThinkMarkets

A side-by-side look at Quadcode Markets and ThinkMarketsusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.

Quadcode Markets logo

Quadcode Markets

Score 8.28

ASIC-regulated trading with spreads from 0.9 pips

ThinkMarkets logo

ThinkMarkets

Score 7.75

Multi-jurisdiction regulated broker trusted across global markets

Quadcode Markets vs ThinkMarkets: the short verdict

Quadcode Markets carries the higher overall score of the two — 8.28 against ThinkMarkets's 7.75. ThinkMarkets lists more regulators than Quadcode Markets (6 to 2), including ASIC, CySEC and FCA. Both run on Proprietary platform. ThinkMarkets additionally lists MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. ThinkMarkets is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2010 against 2022 for Quadcode Markets.

Side-by-side comparison

Quadcode Markets compared with ThinkMarkets
FeatureQuadcode MarketsThinkMarkets
Min Deposit$50 ,20€None
Raw SpreadUndisclosedUndisclosed
Max LeverageVaries by jurisdiction and account typeVaries by jurisdiction and account type
RegulationsASIC, CySECASIC, CySEC, FCA, +3 others
PlatformsProprietary platformMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 others
Islamic AccNoNo
Copy TradingNoNo
Overall rating8.287.75

This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads involving Quadcode Markets and ThinkMarkets.

Still deciding?

Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.

Compare all brokers