Quadcode Markets vs TMGM
A side-by-side look at Quadcode Markets and TMGMusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
Quadcode Markets
Score 8.28ASIC-regulated trading with spreads from 0.9 pips
TMGM
Score 8.58Editorial review of TMGM: regulation, platforms, fees and verdict
Quadcode Markets vs TMGM: the short verdict
TMGM carries the higher overall score of the two — 8.58 against Quadcode Markets's 8.28. TMGM lists more regulators than Quadcode Markets (4 to 2), including ASIC, FMA and FSC Mauritius. On platforms, Quadcode Markets lists Proprietary platform while TMGM lists MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and Web-based. TMGM is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2013 against 2022 for Quadcode Markets.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Quadcode Markets | TMGM |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $50 ,20€ | $100 |
| Raw Spread | Undisclosed | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | - |
| Regulations | ASIC, CySEC | ASIC, FMA, FSC Mauritius, +1 others |
| Platforms | Proprietary platform | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 others |
| Islamic Acc | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Overall rating | 8.28 | 8.58 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving Quadcode Markets and TMGM.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.