Head-to-head broker comparison

ThinkMarkets vs XM Group

A side-by-side look at ThinkMarkets and XM Groupusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.

ThinkMarkets logo

ThinkMarkets

Score 7.75

Multi-jurisdiction regulated broker trusted across global markets

XM Group logo

XM Group

Score 9.15

Multi-jurisdiction regulated broker trusted across global markets

ThinkMarkets vs XM Group: the short verdict

XM Group carries the higher overall score of the two — 9.15 against ThinkMarkets's 7.75. ThinkMarkets lists more regulators than XM Group (6 to 3), including ASIC, CySEC and FCA. ThinkMarkets sets no minimum deposit, where XM Group asks for 5 USD. Both run on MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and Proprietary platform. XM Group is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2009 against 2010 for ThinkMarkets.

Side-by-side comparison

ThinkMarkets compared with XM Group
FeatureThinkMarketsXM Group
Min DepositNone5 USD
Raw SpreadUndisclosedFrom 0.8 pips
Max LeverageVaries by jurisdiction and account type1000:1
RegulationsASIC, CySEC, FCA, +3 othersFSA, FSC, IFSC
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 othersMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 others
Islamic AccNoYes
Copy TradingNoYes
Overall rating7.759.15

This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads involving ThinkMarkets and XM Group.

Still deciding?

Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.

Compare all brokers