ATFX vs IronFX
A side-by-side look at ATFX and IronFXusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
ATFX
Score 7.99Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
IronFX
Score 7.82Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
ATFX vs IronFX: the short verdict
ATFX carries the higher overall score of the two — 7.99 against IronFX's 7.82. ATFX lists more regulators than IronFX (9 to 2), including ASIC, CySEC and FCA. IronFX has the lower minimum deposit at $50, against $500 at ATFX. Both quote raw spreads from 0.0 pips. Both run on MetaTrader 4. ATFX additionally lists MetaTrader 5; IronFX lists Proprietary platform. IronFX is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2010 against 2017 for ATFX.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | ATFX | IronFX |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $500 | $50 |
| Raw Spread | 0.0 pips | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | ASIC, CySEC, FCA, +6 others | FCA, FSCA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform |
| Islamic Acc | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Overall rating | 7.99 | 7.82 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving ATFX and IronFX.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.