FXCM vs IronFX
A side-by-side look at FXCM and IronFXusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
IronFX
Score 7.82Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
FXCM vs IronFX: the short verdict
FXCM carries the higher overall score of the two — 9.4 against IronFX's 7.82. FXCM lists more regulators than IronFX (4 to 2), including ASIC, CySEC and FCA. Both open accounts from the same $50 minimum deposit. IronFX quotes the tighter raw spread — 0.0 pips, against 0.2 pips at FXCM. Both run on MetaTrader 4 and Proprietary platform. FXCM additionally lists Web-based. FXCM is the longer-established of the two, trading since 1999 against 2010 for IronFX.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | FXCM | IronFX |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $50 | $50 |
| Raw Spread | 0.2 pips | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | ASIC, CySEC, FCA, +1 others | FCA, FSCA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform, +1 others | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform |
| Islamic Acc | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Overall rating | 9.4 | 7.82 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving FXCM and IronFX.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.