Head-to-head broker comparison

Exness vs Trading 212

A side-by-side look at Exness and Trading 212using the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.

Exness logo

Exness

Score 4.8

CMA-regulated trading with spreads from 0.0 pips

Trading 212 logo

Trading 212

Score 8.82

Competitive forex and CFD trading for beginners and pros alike

Exness vs Trading 212: the short verdict

Exness lists CMA and CySEC, while Trading 212 lists FCA and FSC Mauritius. Both run on MetaTrader 4 and Proprietary platform. Exness additionally lists MetaTrader 5. Trading 212 is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2006 against 2008 for Exness.

Side-by-side comparison

Exness compared with Trading 212
FeatureExnessTrading 212
Min Deposit$100$1
Raw Spread0.0 pipsUndisclosed
Max Leverage1:500Varies by jurisdiction and account type
RegulationsCMA, CySECFCA, FSC Mauritius
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 othersMetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform
Islamic AccNoNo
Copy TradingNoNo
Overall rating4.88.82

This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads involving Exness and Trading 212.

Still deciding?

Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.

Compare all brokers