STARTRADER vs Trading 212
A side-by-side look at STARTRADER and Trading 212using the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
STARTRADER
Score 9.19Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
Trading 212
Score 8.82Competitive forex and CFD trading for beginners and pros alike
STARTRADER vs Trading 212: the short verdict
STARTRADER carries the higher overall score of the two — 9.19 against Trading 212's 8.82. STARTRADER lists more regulators than Trading 212 (5 to 2), including ASIC, FSA and FSC Mauritius. Trading 212 has the lower minimum deposit at $1, against 50$ at STARTRADER. Both run on MetaTrader 4. STARTRADER additionally lists MetaTrader 5; Trading 212 lists Proprietary platform. Trading 212 is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2006 against 2013 for STARTRADER.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | STARTRADER | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | 50$ | $1 |
| Raw Spread | 0.0 pips | Undisclosed |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | ASIC, FSA, FSC Mauritius, +2 others | FCA, FSC Mauritius |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform |
| Islamic Acc | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Overall rating | 9.19 | 8.82 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving STARTRADER and Trading 212.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.