Trading 212 vs XM Group
A side-by-side look at Trading 212 and XM Groupusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
Trading 212
Score 8.82Competitive forex and CFD trading for beginners and pros alike
XM Group
Score 9.15Multi-jurisdiction regulated broker trusted across global markets
Trading 212 vs XM Group: the short verdict
XM Group carries the higher overall score of the two — 9.15 against Trading 212's 8.82. XM Group lists more regulators than Trading 212 (3 to 2), including FSA, FSC and IFSC. Trading 212 has the lower minimum deposit at $1, against 5 USD at XM Group. Both run on MetaTrader 4 and Proprietary platform. XM Group additionally lists MetaTrader 5. Trading 212 is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2006 against 2009 for XM Group.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Trading 212 | XM Group |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $1 | 5 USD |
| Raw Spread | Undisclosed | From 0.8 pips |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | 1000:1 |
| Regulations | FCA, FSC Mauritius | FSA, FSC, IFSC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 others |
| Islamic Acc | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Overall rating | 8.82 | 9.15 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving Trading 212 and XM Group.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.