Head-to-head broker comparison

FP Markets vs IronFX

A side-by-side look at FP Markets and IronFXusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.

FP Markets logo

FP Markets

Score 8.88

Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure

IronFX logo

IronFX

Score 7.82

Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure

FP Markets vs IronFX: the short verdict

FP Markets carries the higher overall score of the two — 8.88 against IronFX's 7.82. FP Markets lists more regulators than IronFX (4 to 2), including ASIC, CMA and CySEC. IronFX has the lower minimum deposit at $50, against $100 at FP Markets. Both quote raw spreads from 0.0 pips. Both run on MetaTrader 4 and Proprietary platform. FP Markets additionally lists MetaTrader 5 and cTrader. FP Markets is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2005 against 2010 for IronFX.

Side-by-side comparison

FP Markets compared with IronFX
FeatureFP MarketsIronFX
Min Deposit$100$50
Raw Spread0.0 pips0.0 pips
Max LeverageVaries by jurisdiction and account typeVaries by jurisdiction and account type
RegulationsASIC, CMA, CySEC, +1 othersFCA, FSCA
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 othersMetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform
Islamic AccNoNo
Copy TradingNoNo
Overall rating8.887.82

This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads involving FP Markets and IronFX.

Still deciding?

Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.

Compare all brokers