Head-to-head broker comparison

FP Markets vs Tickmill

A side-by-side look at FP Markets and Tickmillusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.

FP Markets logo

FP Markets

Score 8.88

Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure

Tickmill logo

Tickmill

Score 7.62

Multi-jurisdiction regulated broker trusted across global markets

FP Markets vs Tickmill: the short verdict

FP Markets carries the higher overall score of the two — 8.88 against Tickmill's 7.62. Both are listed under CySEC and FSCA, and each names 4 regulators in total. Both open accounts from the same $100 minimum deposit. Both run on MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and Web-based. FP Markets additionally lists cTrader and Proprietary platform. FP Markets is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2005 against 2014 for Tickmill.

Side-by-side comparison

FP Markets compared with Tickmill
FeatureFP MarketsTickmill
Min Deposit$100€100
Raw Spread0.0 pipsUndisclosed
Max LeverageVaries by jurisdiction and account typeVaries by jurisdiction and account type
RegulationsASIC, CMA, CySEC, +1 othersCySEC, FCA, FSA, +1 others
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 othersMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 others
Islamic AccNoNo
Copy TradingNoNo
Overall rating8.887.62

This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads involving FP Markets and Tickmill.

Still deciding?

Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.

Compare all brokers