Head-to-head broker comparison

FXCM vs Tickmill

A side-by-side look at FXCM and Tickmillusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.

FXCM logo

FXCM

Score 9.4

ASIC-regulated trading with spreads from 0.2 pips

Tickmill logo

Tickmill

Score 7.62

Multi-jurisdiction regulated broker trusted across global markets

FXCM vs Tickmill: the short verdict

FXCM carries the higher overall score of the two — 9.4 against Tickmill's 7.62. Both are listed under CySEC and FCA, and each names 4 regulators in total. FXCM has the lower minimum deposit at $50, against €100 at Tickmill. Both run on MetaTrader 4 and Web-based. FXCM additionally lists Proprietary platform; Tickmill lists MetaTrader 5. FXCM is the longer-established of the two, trading since 1999 against 2014 for Tickmill.

Side-by-side comparison

FXCM compared with Tickmill
FeatureFXCMTickmill
Min Deposit$50€100
Raw Spread0.2 pipsUndisclosed
Max LeverageVaries by jurisdiction and account typeVaries by jurisdiction and account type
RegulationsASIC, CySEC, FCA, +1 othersCySEC, FCA, FSA, +1 others
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform, +1 othersMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 others
Islamic AccNoNo
Copy TradingNoNo
Overall rating9.47.62

This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads involving FXCM and Tickmill.

Still deciding?

Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.

Compare all brokers