Head-to-head broker comparison

Tickmill vs XM Group

A side-by-side look at Tickmill and XM Groupusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.

Tickmill logo

Tickmill

Score 7.62

Multi-jurisdiction regulated broker trusted across global markets

XM Group logo

XM Group

Score 9.15

Multi-jurisdiction regulated broker trusted across global markets

Tickmill vs XM Group: the short verdict

XM Group carries the higher overall score of the two — 9.15 against Tickmill's 7.62. Tickmill lists more regulators than XM Group (4 to 3), including CySEC, FCA and FSA. XM Group has the lower minimum deposit at 5 USD, against €100 at Tickmill. Both run on MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. Tickmill additionally lists Web-based; XM Group lists Proprietary platform. XM Group is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2009 against 2014 for Tickmill.

Side-by-side comparison

Tickmill compared with XM Group
FeatureTickmillXM Group
Min Deposit€1005 USD
Raw SpreadUndisclosedFrom 0.8 pips
Max LeverageVaries by jurisdiction and account type1000:1
RegulationsCySEC, FCA, FSA, +1 othersFSA, FSC, IFSC
PlatformsMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 othersMetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 others
Islamic AccNoYes
Copy TradingNoYes
Overall rating7.629.15

This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.

Related comparisons

Other head-to-heads involving Tickmill and XM Group.

Still deciding?

Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.

Compare all brokers