FP Markets vs Trading 212
A side-by-side look at FP Markets and Trading 212using the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
FP Markets
Score 8.88Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
Trading 212
Score 8.82Competitive forex and CFD trading for beginners and pros alike
FP Markets vs Trading 212: the short verdict
FP Markets carries the higher overall score of the two — 8.88 against Trading 212's 8.82. FP Markets lists more regulators than Trading 212 (4 to 2), including ASIC, CMA and CySEC. Trading 212 has the lower minimum deposit at $1, against $100 at FP Markets. Both run on MetaTrader 4 and Proprietary platform. FP Markets additionally lists MetaTrader 5 and cTrader. FP Markets is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2005 against 2006 for Trading 212.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | FP Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $100 | $1 |
| Raw Spread | 0.0 pips | Undisclosed |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | ASIC, CMA, CySEC, +1 others | FCA, FSC Mauritius |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 others | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform |
| Islamic Acc | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Overall rating | 8.88 | 8.82 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving FP Markets and Trading 212.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.