HFM vs PU Prime
A side-by-side look at HFM and PU Primeusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
PU Prime
Score 8.54Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
HFM vs PU Prime: the short verdict
PU Prime carries the higher overall score of the two — 8.54 against HFM's 7.74. HFM lists more regulators than PU Prime (6 to 5), including CMA, DFSA and FCA. HFM sets no minimum deposit, where PU Prime asks for $20. Both run on MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and Proprietary platform. PU Prime additionally lists Web-based. HFM is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2010 against 2015 for PU Prime.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | HFM | PU Prime |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $0 | $20 |
| Raw Spread | Undisclosed | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | CMA, DFSA, FCA, +3 others | ASIC, CMA, FSA, +2 others |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 others | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +2 others |
| Islamic Acc | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Overall rating | 7.74 | 8.54 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving HFM and PU Prime.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.