HFM vs STARTRADER
A side-by-side look at HFM and STARTRADERusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
STARTRADER
Score 9.19Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
HFM vs STARTRADER: the short verdict
STARTRADER carries the higher overall score of the two — 9.19 against HFM's 7.74. HFM lists more regulators than STARTRADER (6 to 5), including CMA, DFSA and FCA. HFM sets no minimum deposit, where STARTRADER asks for 50$. Both run on MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. HFM additionally lists Proprietary platform. HFM is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2010 against 2013 for STARTRADER.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | HFM | STARTRADER |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $0 | 50$ |
| Raw Spread | Undisclosed | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | CMA, DFSA, FCA, +3 others | ASIC, FSA, FSC Mauritius, +2 others |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 others | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 |
| Islamic Acc | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Overall rating | 7.74 | 9.19 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving HFM and STARTRADER.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.