IronFX vs Quadcode Markets
A side-by-side look at IronFX and Quadcode Marketsusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
IronFX
Score 7.82Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
Quadcode Markets
Score 8.28ASIC-regulated trading with spreads from 0.9 pips
IronFX vs Quadcode Markets: the short verdict
Quadcode Markets carries the higher overall score of the two — 8.28 against IronFX's 7.82. IronFX lists FCA and FSCA, while Quadcode Markets lists ASIC and CySEC. Both run on Proprietary platform. IronFX additionally lists MetaTrader 4. IronFX is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2010 against 2022 for Quadcode Markets.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | IronFX | Quadcode Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $50 | $50 ,20€ |
| Raw Spread | 0.0 pips | Undisclosed |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | FCA, FSCA | ASIC, CySEC |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform | Proprietary platform |
| Islamic Acc | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Overall rating | 7.82 | 8.28 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving IronFX and Quadcode Markets.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.