IronFX vs ThinkMarkets
A side-by-side look at IronFX and ThinkMarketsusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
IronFX
Score 7.82Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
ThinkMarkets
Score 7.75Multi-jurisdiction regulated broker trusted across global markets
IronFX vs ThinkMarkets: the short verdict
IronFX carries the higher overall score of the two — 7.82 against ThinkMarkets's 7.75. ThinkMarkets lists more regulators than IronFX (6 to 2), including ASIC, CySEC and FCA. ThinkMarkets sets no minimum deposit, where IronFX asks for $50. Both run on MetaTrader 4 and Proprietary platform. ThinkMarkets additionally lists MetaTrader 5. Both have been operating since 2010.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | IronFX | ThinkMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $50 | None |
| Raw Spread | 0.0 pips | Undisclosed |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | FCA, FSCA | ASIC, CySEC, FCA, +3 others |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 others |
| Islamic Acc | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Overall rating | 7.82 | 7.75 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving IronFX and ThinkMarkets.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.