Quadcode Markets vs Trading 212
A side-by-side look at Quadcode Markets and Trading 212using the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
Quadcode Markets
Score 8.28ASIC-regulated trading with spreads from 0.9 pips
Trading 212
Score 8.82Competitive forex and CFD trading for beginners and pros alike
Quadcode Markets vs Trading 212: the short verdict
Trading 212 carries the higher overall score of the two — 8.82 against Quadcode Markets's 8.28. Quadcode Markets lists ASIC and CySEC, while Trading 212 lists FCA and FSC Mauritius. Both run on Proprietary platform. Trading 212 additionally lists MetaTrader 4. Trading 212 is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2006 against 2022 for Quadcode Markets.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Quadcode Markets | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $50 ,20€ | $1 |
| Raw Spread | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | ASIC, CySEC | FCA, FSC Mauritius |
| Platforms | Proprietary platform | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform |
| Islamic Acc | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Overall rating | 8.28 | 8.82 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving Quadcode Markets and Trading 212.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.