ATFX vs Pepperstone
A side-by-side look at ATFX and Pepperstoneusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
ATFX
Score 7.99Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
ATFX vs Pepperstone: the short verdict
ATFX lists more regulators than Pepperstone (9 to 7), including ASIC, CySEC and FCA. Both quote raw spreads from 0.0 pips. Both run on MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. Pepperstone additionally lists cTrader and TradingView. Pepperstone is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2010 against 2017 for ATFX.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | ATFX | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $500 | $10 |
| Raw Spread | 0.0 pips | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | 200:1 |
| Regulations | ASIC, CySEC, FCA, +6 others | ASIC, FCA, BaFin, +4 others |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 others |
| Islamic Acc | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Overall rating | 7.99 | 4.7 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving ATFX and Pepperstone.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.