FXCM vs Pepperstone
A side-by-side look at FXCM and Pepperstoneusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
FXCM vs Pepperstone: the short verdict
Pepperstone lists more regulators than FXCM (7 to 4), including ASIC, FCA and BaFin. Pepperstone quotes the tighter raw spread — 0.0 pips, against 0.2 pips at FXCM. Both run on MetaTrader 4. FXCM additionally lists Proprietary platform and Web-based; Pepperstone lists MetaTrader 5 and cTrader. FXCM is the longer-established of the two, trading since 1999 against 2010 for Pepperstone.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | FXCM | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $50 | $10 |
| Raw Spread | 0.2 pips | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | 200:1 |
| Regulations | ASIC, CySEC, FCA, +1 others | ASIC, FCA, BaFin, +4 others |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform, +1 others | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 others |
| Islamic Acc | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Overall rating | 9.4 | 4.7 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving FXCM and Pepperstone.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.