Pepperstone vs STARTRADER
A side-by-side look at Pepperstone and STARTRADERusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
STARTRADER
Score 9.19Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
Pepperstone vs STARTRADER: the short verdict
Pepperstone lists more regulators than STARTRADER (7 to 5), including ASIC, FCA and BaFin. Both quote raw spreads from 0.0 pips. Both run on MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. Pepperstone additionally lists cTrader and TradingView. Pepperstone is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2010 against 2013 for STARTRADER.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Pepperstone | STARTRADER |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $10 | 50$ |
| Raw Spread | 0.0 pips | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | 200:1 | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | ASIC, FCA, BaFin, +4 others | ASIC, FSA, FSC Mauritius, +2 others |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 others | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 |
| Islamic Acc | Yes | No |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 9.19 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving Pepperstone and STARTRADER.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.