FP Markets vs Pepperstone
A side-by-side look at FP Markets and Pepperstoneusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
FP Markets
Score 8.88Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
FP Markets vs Pepperstone: the short verdict
Pepperstone lists more regulators than FP Markets (7 to 4), including ASIC, FCA and BaFin. Pepperstone has the lower minimum deposit at $10, against $100 at FP Markets. Both quote raw spreads from 0.0 pips. Both run on MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and cTrader. FP Markets additionally lists Proprietary platform and Web-based; Pepperstone lists TradingView and Native Mobile App. FP Markets is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2005 against 2010 for Pepperstone.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | FP Markets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $100 | $10 |
| Raw Spread | 0.0 pips | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | 200:1 |
| Regulations | ASIC, CMA, CySEC, +1 others | ASIC, FCA, BaFin, +4 others |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 others | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 others |
| Islamic Acc | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Overall rating | 8.88 | 4.7 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving FP Markets and Pepperstone.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.