FP Markets vs Pepperstone
A side-by-side look at FP Markets and Pepperstoneusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
FP Markets
Score 8.88Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
FP Markets vs Pepperstone: the short verdict
Pepperstone lists more regulators than FP Markets (7 to 4), including ASIC, FCA and BaFin. Both quote raw spreads from 0.0 pips. Both run on MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5 and cTrader. FP Markets additionally lists Proprietary platform and Web-based; Pepperstone lists TradingView and Native Mobile App. FP Markets is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2005 against 2010 for Pepperstone.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | FP Markets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $100 | $10 |
| Raw Spread | 0.0 pips | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | 200:1 |
| Regulations | ASIC, CMA, CySEC, +1 others | ASIC, FCA, BaFin, +4 others |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 others | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 others |
| Islamic Acc | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Overall rating | 8.88 | 4.7 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving FP Markets and Pepperstone.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.