HFM vs Trading 212
A side-by-side look at HFM and Trading 212using the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
Trading 212
Score 8.82Competitive forex and CFD trading for beginners and pros alike
HFM vs Trading 212: the short verdict
Trading 212 carries the higher overall score of the two — 8.82 against HFM's 7.74. HFM lists more regulators than Trading 212 (6 to 2), including CMA, DFSA and FCA. HFM sets no minimum deposit, where Trading 212 asks for $1. Both run on MetaTrader 4 and Proprietary platform. HFM additionally lists MetaTrader 5. Trading 212 is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2006 against 2010 for HFM.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | HFM | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $0 | $1 |
| Raw Spread | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | CMA, DFSA, FCA, +3 others | FCA, FSC Mauritius |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 others | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform |
| Islamic Acc | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Overall rating | 7.74 | 8.82 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving HFM and Trading 212.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.