IronFX vs Tickmill
A side-by-side look at IronFX and Tickmillusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
IronFX
Score 7.82Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
Tickmill
Score 7.62Multi-jurisdiction regulated broker trusted across global markets
IronFX vs Tickmill: the short verdict
IronFX carries the higher overall score of the two — 7.82 against Tickmill's 7.62. Tickmill lists more regulators than IronFX (4 to 2), including CySEC, FCA and FSA. IronFX has the lower minimum deposit at $50, against €100 at Tickmill. Both run on MetaTrader 4. IronFX additionally lists Proprietary platform; Tickmill lists MetaTrader 5 and Web-based. IronFX is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2010 against 2014 for Tickmill.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | IronFX | Tickmill |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $50 | €100 |
| Raw Spread | 0.0 pips | Undisclosed |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | FCA, FSCA | CySEC, FCA, FSA, +1 others |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 others |
| Islamic Acc | No | No |
| Copy Trading | No | No |
| Overall rating | 7.82 | 7.62 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving IronFX and Tickmill.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.