HFM vs Pepperstone
A side-by-side look at HFM and Pepperstoneusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
HFM vs Pepperstone: the short verdict
Pepperstone lists more regulators than HFM (7 to 6), including ASIC, FCA and BaFin. Both run on MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. HFM additionally lists Proprietary platform; Pepperstone lists cTrader and TradingView. Both have been operating since 2010.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | HFM | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $0 | $10 |
| Raw Spread | Undisclosed | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | 200:1 |
| Regulations | CMA, DFSA, FCA, +3 others | ASIC, FCA, BaFin, +4 others |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +1 others | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 others |
| Islamic Acc | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Overall rating | 7.74 | 4.7 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving HFM and Pepperstone.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.