IronFX vs Pepperstone
A side-by-side look at IronFX and Pepperstoneusing the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
IronFX
Score 7.82Low-spread ECN execution from 0.0 pips on institutional-grade infrastructure
IronFX vs Pepperstone: the short verdict
Pepperstone lists more regulators than IronFX (7 to 2), including ASIC, FCA and BaFin. Both quote raw spreads from 0.0 pips. Both run on MetaTrader 4. IronFX additionally lists Proprietary platform; Pepperstone lists MetaTrader 5 and cTrader. Both have been operating since 2010.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | IronFX | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $50 | $10 |
| Raw Spread | 0.0 pips | 0.0 pips |
| Max Leverage | Varies by jurisdiction and account type | 200:1 |
| Regulations | FCA, FSCA | ASIC, FCA, BaFin, +4 others |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 others |
| Islamic Acc | No | Yes |
| Copy Trading | No | Yes |
| Overall rating | 7.82 | 4.7 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving IronFX and Pepperstone.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.