Pepperstone vs Trading 212
A side-by-side look at Pepperstone and Trading 212using the data we hold on each — score, regulators, platforms, minimum deposit, spreads and leverage. Blank fields mean we have nothing verified on record, not a “no”.
Trading 212
Score 8.82Competitive forex and CFD trading for beginners and pros alike
Pepperstone vs Trading 212: the short verdict
Pepperstone lists more regulators than Trading 212 (7 to 2), including ASIC, FCA and BaFin. Both run on MetaTrader 4. Pepperstone additionally lists MetaTrader 5 and cTrader; Trading 212 lists Proprietary platform. Trading 212 is the longer-established of the two, trading since 2006 against 2010 for Pepperstone.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Pepperstone | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Min Deposit | $10 | $1 |
| Raw Spread | 0.0 pips | Undisclosed |
| Max Leverage | 200:1 | Varies by jurisdiction and account type |
| Regulations | ASIC, FCA, BaFin, +4 others | FCA, FSC Mauritius |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, +3 others | MetaTrader 4, Proprietary platform |
| Islamic Acc | Yes | No |
| Copy Trading | Yes | No |
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 8.82 |
This comparison is an independent directory listing, not financial advice or a recommendation. Trading forex and CFDs carries a significant risk of loss. Always verify a broker's regulatory status with the official authority before depositing.
Related comparisons
Other head-to-heads involving Pepperstone and Trading 212.
Still deciding?
Browse the full directory and filter brokers by regulator, platform and deposit.